This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0095327X07308629v1 34/4/615    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rosman-Stollman, E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Mediating Structures and the Military

The Case of Religious Soldiers

Bar Ilan University, Ashkelon Academic College, rosman{at}atranet.co.il

Very few armed forces consciously relate to the religious component of soldiers' identities. Like religions, the military system demands individuals to conform to rules and schedules. Should military and religious obligations clash, soldiers are forced to choose. When modern armed forces relate to religious elements in their members' identities, how do they do so? What are the conditions most conducive to a military relating to the religious component of its soldiers' identities? This article posits a framework for the analysis of both questions, employing the concept of mediating structures to illustrate the mechanisms whereby militaries and religions accommodate each other and Luckham's typology of boundaries (integral, permeable, fragmented) to identify the conditions that are most—and least—hospitable to mediation. This framework is illustrated by references to institutional and individual relations between religion and armed forces in Iran, Israel, Turkey, the United States, and India.

Key Words: religion • military • mediating structure • civil—military boundaries

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?